Controlled Assessment: moving out of the comfort zone
12 Oct
As we have begun Year 11 with our second cohort of students who will negotiate the hopefully shortlived scenario of controlled assessment, we are now in the position to be able to learn from last year and reflect on how to get the best work out of our students.
Controlled Assessment in MFL, most particularly in writing, is as much a test of memorisation and work ethic as skill, talent or linguistic flair. To be successful, students put together and learn by heart 300 words of higher-tier level crafted text following work in class and preparation at home (best case scenario). Or on the bus on the way to school. Or they turn up with a nervous smile and a tatty vocab list and hope for the best.
Hours are spent by teachers scaffolding adaptable high-scoring phrases, demonstrating snazzy compound-clause sentences and gleefully recounting how yes, if you write this it will *definitely* help you get an A*.
So, we ask ourselves with our heads in our hands, why do too many our students wilfully ignore all our advice, refuse to use the phrases they have been given and strike out wildly on their own with only the dictionary and a highly questionable grasp of the perfect tense to help them through? Especially the ones who most need our help?
Reflection #1
Students are fundamentally uneasy about adapting language we as teachers give them for an assessed piece. There is a problem of ownership. Some even seem to think it might almost be cheating to just 'use stuff off the vocab sheet'. Aiming to please but misguidedly thinking they have to somehow go back to the beginning to do so, they start their preparation with their books closed and hope for the best. Rare is the student who without prompting will properly and thoroughly use resources, books and reference materials to even half their fullest potential to produce a high level piece of work. Why?
Reflection #2
Controlled assessment, despite its attempts at becoming a normal part of classroom routine, is highly stressful for a lot of students. When under pressure, many students will revert to their linguistic comfort zone, which for many is about the mid-point of Year 8 before life got too complicated and full of tenses and agreements. This becomes very obvious if the focus of CA is something like school or holidays: topics they have revisited ad nauseam since early KS3. In adversity, students will instinctively rootle around in their memories for old trusted basics rather than be brave and use the relatively new language they built onto the topic when it was revisited in KS4.
We see strong evidence of this the minute we give students a CA task using material that they didn't study at KS3 at all. Performance in CA on the Environment last year was consistently higher from our students than on more supposedly accessible topics because the candidates didn't have a Year 8 comfort zone to refer to: they had never covered the topic before. They really used a significant number of higher level constructions and many had a much more impressive range of vocabulary and structures than in their other pieces.
What now?
I am pushing this year for us to take this approach to all CA tasks in the department. We do the students a disservice by making the bullet points too apparently straightforward as the natural response doesn't build in enough of the higher-level language they need to perform at the top level. If we push them hard in the bullet points to write maturely and with complexity rather than sink into the comfortable illusion that simplicity is the safe option, I believe we will see a much stronger performance across the board.












